SEALED RECORDS …AGAIN?
Emotion ALWAYS Triumphs Over the Responsibility of Vetting
As most people who read my articles already know, I personally broke free of my own psychological yoke of servitude to America’s owners and masters and I removed myself from their political party after the most openly fraudulent yet uncontested so-called “election” back in 2012. From that point on I have been able to sit back and watch the pathetic manipulation of America as an ‘outsider’ which has allowed me for the very first time in my life of voting to actually see with clear eyes what is taking place in this nation and how it is being steadily herded toward its own national demise.
This nation is once again deeply engrossed in yet ANOTHER masterfully managed round up of the flocks of sheeple in order to herd them complacently toward their ultimate national destruction.
Your Masters have provided for you a large group of primary sheeple herders from which you are to choose ONLY ONE to be your head shepherd.
TWO from the communist managed left side of their flock. ONE a lifelong criminal who feels that she is above the law and likewise feels that she is “entitled” to rule over the sheeple. The other a lifelong loser who has been on the government dole his entire life who has a very apparent deep seeded jealousy of and even hatred for those in life who were actually able to accomplish things and create wealth for themselves. And we are now down to SEVEN from the globalist right side of their flock after starting out with FOURTEEN PLUS ONE. I SAID FOURTEEN PLUS ONE BECAUSE there is ALSO an OUTSIDER running in the right side that is included with the SEVEN remaining. An outsider that doesn’t come from your masters group of preapproved contenders. But they are doing everything possible to get him removed (short of arranging and “accident” or even doing another Kennedy). Their entire media that controls the majority of the thought processes of the sheeple in both sides of their flock has officially declared their dislike for him and vowed to use any and all means to discredit him in order to remove him from contention. Your Masters don’t OWN him and as such they can’t CONTROL him. Therefore they NEED to remove him from contention. The problem for them is that they can’t DEFUND him to get rid of him THAT way because he is a highly successful businessman that is SELF FUNDING his entire campaign.
Yes I am referring to Trump. And like him or hate him everyone needs to be honest enough with themselves to admit that his presence in this primary circus has aroused more interest in that political show than any other contender in multiple generations.
Being as successful and well versed in human behavior as he is, he CHOSE to become a contender in the right side of the owners political party, because he KNOWS herd mentality. He KNOWS that the owners’ media controls the entire thought processes of the American sheeple, and through their media they have retained absolute OWNERSHIP of this nations’ “government” by making sure their media keeps the sheeple mentally locked into only the right or the left sides of their private political party. No other political party or Independent is ever mentioned as being existent by them. As such their media keeps the psychological yokes of servitude to them and ONLY to them firmly locked on the sheeple. So Trump knows that to run as an Independent right from the start would have been a futile endeavor.
The owners’ management team for their right flock known as the Republican National Committee demanded that Trump sign an agreement NOT to run as an Independent should he not receive the nomination. Trump agreed to it on the condition that he be treated FAIRLY by the owners and their media. He agreed to it because he knows that any contract entered into under ‘emotional duress’ can easily be broken. They in essence FORCED him to sign it under emotional duress. THEN the owners’ entire media began to attack him in any way they could to discredit him. Phony “public opinion polls” were then created showing him losing his massive lead over the other contenders and those were in addition to so-called “commentary” from the majority of those idols of the sheeple in the owners’ media claiming he just is not “good enough” to be POTUS. Yet the crowds Trump attracted and still attracts to this day make the others look like they are all campaigning for local offices instead of national office.
But the owners’ media still keeps to their scripts and keeps trying in any way to discredit him with only extremely marginal success. That leaves the preset outcomes of those electronic voting machines and tabulators as their LAST HOPE to get rid of him. However … if they succeed in forcing him out of contention in their private political party, because of the national daily coverage they have ALREADY given him, Trump knows that NOW he could effectively run as an Independent. And with the massive crowds that he draws, he could win because he is truly the choice of the majority (barring the published outcomes of those preset voting machines and tabulators that no one really cares enough to get rid of and return this nation to more honest elections).
IN SECOND PLACE on the right side is Ted Cruz. He is someone that originally I liked and supported. In fact to PROVE that I have at one time supported Cruz all you need to do is click on this title to be taken to my article ‘I Like, I respect, I support Ted Cruz’ that I published all the way back in December of 2013. I liked him and supported him because like ALL of those who still support him I was taken in by nothing at all more than his ‘pro America speeches’. He appeared at that time to be a speck of light coming from the dense darkness engulfing the District of Corruption.
However … as time passed that ‘speck of light’ appeared to be more an illusion. I began to look into MORE than just his pro America speeches. I looked into not only WHO was financially backing his campaign but went even further and looked into his personal history as well. At this point if it were to become a requirement that all politicians wear the patches of their sponsors like NASCAR drivers do, then Cruz would look NO DIFFERENT than ANY of the other politicians in the privately owned and controlled “government” of America’s owners and masters.
But it goes DEEPER than that. MUCH DEEPER. He is not only financially backed by Goldman Sachs, one of America’s owners but his wife is an executive in Goldman Sachs. And she is not JUST an executive, she actually worked on their New World Order project as well as being a member of the CFR.
STILL I was personally willing to be like everyone else and overlook those facts. So much so that I openly questioned WHY Cruz suddenly turned on his “friend” Trump and attacked him causing Trump to fire back. I actually thought it was just a ruse planned by both he and Trump to focus ALL attention on themselves and no one else. I published THAT THOUGHT as well in the article titled ‘Possible Masterful Manipulation of the Masses’ which can be read by just clicking on THAT title. In that article I actually suggested that the two should stop their squabbling and join together and work as a Trump / Cruz team and totally end the entire primary circus on the right side of the owners political party.
I was WRONG. It was NOT a ruse. In the comments section of that particular article I made the statement that I was wrong in my questioning, and based upon what I ALSO have found, I can no longer personally support Ted Cruz at all.
I came across an article that I found quite interesting. I read it all the way through THREE TIMES OVER. I then began to actually VERIFY EVERYTHING that was stated in that published article. EVERYTHING they stated was totally FACTUAL. It now raised a very SERIOUS question …
WHY DID TED CRUZ SEAL HIS RECORDS?
We already have a foreign born anti America muslim sitting in the highest “elected” political office in this land. He was placed into that position by manipulating the emotions and overall playing upon the actual STUPIDITY of the America sheeple. He was placed there by your masters because of his hatred for this nation and his total willingness to openly oppose and attempt to circumvent what is left of this nations’ constitution.
Your masters knew that his foreign born status was in violation of the constitution and that they couldn’t effectively cover it by just claiming that his mother was an American citizen, because there is MORE to it than just having one American parent. So ALL of HIS records were SEALED to prevent exposure of Treason to this nation and then not one, but TWO totally fraudulent birth certificates were published claiming he was born in Hawaii. BOTH OF WHICH were immediately exposed and PROVEN to be false. But your masters anticipated the reaction to THAT as well and already had their puppets in their media ATTACKING those who were trying to expose the TRUTH, creating yet another new word for the American language and labelled them as “BIRTHERS” and made that label into a derogatory.
America’s owners know that Americans of today will always be Americans of today and as such will eventually back down and give up on any and all INTERNAL conflicts. The few challenges to the fraud that were actually able to make it into a courtroom were put down by privately owned anti America leftist judges. ALL of them stating the most asinine reasons as grounds for their rulings. The owners’ media then broadly claimed “yet another birther attempt put down” to further keep the sheeple in submission. And the fraud that occupies the oval office is still there to this day.
WHY did CRUZ seal HIS Records?
WHERE IS the Consular Report of Birth Abroad of a citizen of the United States of America? That isn’t something that is made up. It IS a requirement. So WHERE is it?
Just the fact that he did SEAL his records and there appears to be no record of this document SHOULD arouse a GREAT DEAL of SUSPICION in the people that support him, the same as it has in those who do not support him.
BUT in America as it exists today EMOTION WILL ALWAYS TRIUMPH OVER LOGIC AND TRUTH.
Many of those who steadfastly support Cruz were among those screaming FOUL when the communist side of their masters’ political party placed a foreign born up for the office of POTUS. But NOW that the shoe may very possibly be on the other foot, because they support him, his followers are condemning those who not only support Trump, but those who support ALL of the other contenders as well by desperately clinging to the idea that WHERE a person is born doesn’t matter as long as they have at least ONE American parent. They have absolutely NO knowledge that there is MORE required than just having a single parent be American. And they have NO interest at all in learning the facts pertaining to the requirements of being legally a natural born American citizen. EMOTION as always ranks above facts.
Now there are MANY that claim that Rubio (who in his very short time in the senate has justifiably earned the nickname Rubiobama) should ALSO be disqualified from contention because although he was born in America HIS parents did not become American citizens until AFTER his birth. And THAT is actually true as well. Rubio’s citizenship itself is protected under the fourteenth amendment because his parents were in this country LAWFULLY. But THAT does NOT make HIM a natural born citizen either. Many people who do not want to know the truth believe that any child born in this country is an automatic natural born citizen, but that is not true. However that total misconception is being held up as a reason to allow the children of illegals to be considered citizens. They are not. Rubio IS a legal citizen but he is NOT a natural born citizen. Whether it can be shown that the circumstances of his birth can actually in some way qualify him is for constitution scholars to determine. But in America as it exists today, that will quite probably not ever be brought up.
However the actual CITIZENSHIP of Mr. Cruz as well as whether he can be declared natural born IS in question and MANY constitutional scholars say he is NOT. He should just unseal his records and show that he was listed as having dual citizenship at birth. It would end it. Unless it doesn’t exist.
When I read the enclosed article published by a Law Group that is NOT politically affiliated with EITHER SIDE of the private political party of America’s owners, I decided to share the article on a few websites.
The following is not only the entire article but my exact introduction to the article as it appeared on a few of those sites. In my intro as you will see, I ASKED for rebuttals. BUT I asked that those rebuttals NOT be just an emotional expression but rather provide some type of PROOF that contradicts what I myself researched and found out about this subject. I received ONLY ONE rebuttal and it was PURELY EMOTIONAL and TOTALLY VOID of an FACTS.
***** I am not one of the sheeple. I do not belong to either the right or left flock.
I am an Independent who cannot vote in the primaries of the political party of America’s Masters.
So I get to watch BOTH flocks from the sidelines.
But I did recently publish an article requesting Trump and Cruz end their squabble and work as a team. However … I wrote that article BEFORE I was made aware of THIS article that is backed with documentation that corrects a widespread misunderstanding of natural born. And because of what I read here, I personally can no longer endorse Cruz as a legitimate contender.
This article is VERY Interesting, especially since it comes from attorneys who have in-depth understanding of the Constitution and what is required to be regarded as ‘natural born’.
So let’s see what the self-appointed constitutional scholars have to say in rebuttal to this.
Seriously I’m interested in seeing rebuttals to this. But the rebuttals need to be backed up with verifiable documentation like this article is, and not just emotional comments based solely on what they have heard from others. *****
What I did not mention in this intro to those sites was that at one time and here on the Ignored Political Reality website I even published an article stating that I respected and I liked and I supported Ted Cruz. And because I published it, I myself may have at that time been no different than the rest of America because I too may have Ignored Political Reality. I feel that I have now corrected what may have been a mistake on my part.
I will end my part of this article here and let the readers decide for themselves if we are facing ANOTHER 2008 type contender for the office of POTUS. I’m ALSO including two additional links to information that SOME may find a bit interesting.
The following article in its’ entirety was published by North American Law Center. All content in the following belongs to them and nothing was altered from their publication:
TED CRUZ IS IN THE U.S. SENATE ILLEGALLY?
© JB Williams Jb.email@example.com
US Senator Ted Cruz, from Texas, has been under fire in his bid for the White House due to his Canadian citizenship records which make it quite clear that he does not meet the Constitutional “natural born Citizen” requirement for the Oval Office, despite the opinion letter from his Harvard friends.
Following a total lack of vetting on Barack Hussein Obama in 2008 and 2012, many insist that no one ever enter the Oval Office again without proper vetting, including proof of meeting all Constitutional requirements for office. Obama’s massive destruction of our Constitutional Republic has placed the issue of Constitutional eligibility on the front burner for many Americans, and partisanship has nothing to do with it.
In the effort to vet every 2016 presidential candidate, Cruz, who had once stated that both he and Barack Obama were ineligible for the Oval Office, found himself under tight scrutiny from the same people who tried to stop Obama from taking the Oval Office via fraud. Ted placed himself in the crosshairs of constitutionalists who do not care about partisan politics, by seeking an office he is not eligible to seek.
In investigating Cruz eligibility for the Oval Office, his eligibility for the US Senate came into question…
The Constitutional requirements for the US Senate are as follows;
“No Person shall be a Senator who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty Years, and been nine Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State for which he shall be chosen.”
At 42 years old in 2012, Ted Cruz obviously met the age requirement of 30 years. However, he also needed to meet the requirement of at least “nine Years a Citizen of the United States.” As the Constitution states, one cannot be just an “Inhabitant of that State for which he shall be chosen.”
The known source for the Founders use of the term natural born Citizen, The Law of Nations, also defines “Inhabitant” as follows;
- 213. Inhabitants.
“The inhabitants, as distinguished from citizens, are foreigners, who are permitted to settle and stay in the country. Bound to the society by their residence, they are subject to the laws of the state while they reside in it; and they are obliged to defend it, because it grants them protection, though they do not participate in all the rights of citizens. They enjoy only the advantages which the law or custom gives them. The perpetual inhabitants are those who have received the right of perpetual residence. These are a kind of citizens of an inferior order, and are united to the society without participating in all its advantages. Their children follow the condition of their fathers; and, as the state has given to these the right of perpetual residence, their right passes to their posterity.”
Today, the legal term for this condition in the United States is “illegal alien,” someone in our country and living under U.S. jurisdiction, without legally belonging to society. Modern social justice attitudes often refer to these people as “undocumented citizens” which of course are not citizens at all. Our I.R.S. created a new class of “citizen” for the purpose of collecting taxes from illegal aliens, “resident alien” which is an inhabitant (not a citizen) who pays taxes.
Contrary to current leftist social justice ideologies that view all “illegal aliens” in the U.S. as only “unauthorized” or “undocumented” citizens, our laws identify them as nothing more than “illegal aliens,” or “resident aliens” who pay taxes under I.R.S. codes.
Further, in any matter of law, authenticated evidence supersedes any and all politically motivated opinions, especially opinions which are either unfounded or poorly founded. Unlike Barack Hussein Obama who posted three forged U.S. Certifications of Live Birth and later a Hawaiian newspaper announcement of his birth to evidence his Oval Office eligibility, Ted Cruz issued his Canadian Birth Certificate as evidence of being “born a citizen of Canada.”
The above Canadian document is proof of Canadian Citizenship at birth for Senator Ted Cruz. The next piece of authenticated evidence released by Ted Cruz is a Canadian document proving that he remained a legal citizen of Canada until renouncing that citizenship in May of 2014, which means, he was still a legal citizen of Canada in 2012 when he ran for, was elected and took the oath of office for the US Senate.
Again, the above authenticated evidence proves that Ted Cruz was born Canadian in 1970 and remained a legal citizen of Canada until renouncing his Canadian citizenship in May of 2014. These official documents also prove that Ted Cruz was a legal citizen of Canada in 2012, when he sought and claimed a seat in the U.S. Senate as a legal US citizen.
As a result of this damning evidence, the Cruz campaign hired friends at Harvard to issue a letter which makes a legal case for how Ted Cruz (and Barack Obama) might be a natural born Citizen of the United States eligible to seek the Oval Office. However, a legal opinion letter is not equal to, nor does it supersede authentic evidence to the contrary.
It is possible for a child to be born outside of the United States, and still acquire legal U.S. citizenship at birth through a parent, according to U.S. Naturalization codes pertaining to “Citizenship at Birth for Children Born Outside the U.S. and its Territories.” If the related conditions are met, a child born outside of the United States to one U.S. Citizen parent, in this case, Ted’s mother, the parents can file for and receive U.S. Citizenship for the child by filing a CRBA form with a U.S. Consulate at the time of birth.
The statutes governing this naturalization process state;
“A child born abroad to a U.S. citizen parent or parents may acquire U.S. citizenship at birth if certain statutory requirements are met. The child’s parents should contact the nearest U.S. embassy or consulate to apply for a Consular Report of Birth Abroad of a Citizen of the United States of America (CRBA) to document that the child is a U.S. citizen. If the U.S. embassy or consulate determines that the child acquired U.S. citizenship at birth, a consular officer will approve the CRBA application and the Department of State will issue a CRBA, also called a Form FS-240, in the child’s name.”
According to related U.S. laws governing “Citizenship at Birth for Children Born Outside the U.S. and its Territories,” the following conditions had to be met in order for Ted Cruz to legally claim U.S. citizenship at birth via these naturalization statutes, through his mother.
The U.S. citizen parent had been physically present in the U.S. or its territories for a period of at least five years at some time in his or her life prior to the birth, of which at least two years were after his or her 14th birthday.
If the U.S. citizen parent spent time abroad in any of the following three capacities, this can also be counted towards the physical presence requirement:
- Serving honorably in the U.S. armed forces; • Employed with the U.S. government; or • Employed with certain international organizations.
Additionally, time spent abroad by the U.S. citizen parent while the U.S. citizen parent was the unmarried son or daughter and a member of the household of a person who meets any of the three conditions listed above can also be counted.
Ted’s parents were at no time serving in the U.S. Armed Forces, employed by the U.S. Government or by any of the certain international organizations, during their eight years in Canada, between 1966 and 1974. Further, Ted’s father Rafael, was at no time a legal citizen of the United States prior to naturalizing in 2005, from Canada. Rafael’s known legal citizenship status as of 1970 was Cuban, not American.
This is an EXAMPLE of a US CRBA Form:
Unfortunately, there is no evidence to suggest that the parent or parents of Ted Cruz ever filed a CRBA form with the U.S. Government in or around 1970, which is why Ted Cruz released a copy of his Canadian citizenship records and not any U.S. citizenship records. At present, all FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) requests filed in search of any U.S. citizenship documents to confirm the true official U.S. citizenship status of Ted Cruz have been denied access. All citizenship records for Ted Cruz are sealed unless and until Ted Cruz agrees to allow any such records to be released by either U.S. or Canadian agencies.
As a result, there remains no authentic evidence to support the claims that Ted Cruz is either a “natural born” or “naturalized” citizen of the United States.
Without any form of U.S. Citizenship documentation, and proof of Canadian citizenship at birth in 1970 and holding that legal status until May 2014 when he renounced his birth citizenship to Canada, there is no way for Ted Cruz to prove that he is either “natural born” and eligible for the Oval Office, or “naturalized” prior to 2012, when he sought and accepted a seat in the U.S. Senate as a legal citizen of Canada.
On the basis of all available evidence today, Ted Cruz is in fact holding a seat in the U.S. Senate illegally, with no documented proof of legal U.S. citizenship whatsoever, and proof of Canadian citizenship between the years of birth in 1970 and May 2014.
It is unfortunate that a person so many have placed their political faith in has proven willing to defraud his supporters for both votes and millions in campaign donations. But it is better we know now, than after he wins the GOP nomination only to be destroyed by Democrats later, using the same facts and evidence presented here.
What will the people do with this knowledge? Are they really motivated by restoration of Constitutional compliance, or mere political expediency?
Political commentary from writers – Sealed Records … Again?